5/5/2023 0 Comments Reason for mac cost![]() ![]() As a result, customers can save money by deploying Mac servers to support both Mac and Windows, suggests Mike Silver, VP of research in the Gartner Group’s Client Computing Group.īut meanwhile, many other businesses have either already implemented Mac-only deployments or are moving in that direction. In contrast, Microsoft’s client access licenses (CALs) for Windows servers impose extra costs based on number of clients. ![]() “With one Xserve license, you can support unlimited numbers of users,” the IT manager notes. On the strictly OS side, Wozniak cites scalability of a different kind. “You can only fit 10 of them in one rack, versus 42 in a rack for Xserves,” he adds. He also finds IBM PC servers consume more space in the data center than Xserves, while adding extra costs for rack hardware. New IBM iSeries servers go for $100,000 and up, according to Wozniak. Much of Tayco’s reason for switching to Macs boils down to hardware costs. He’s also considering swapping out the two iSeries, which are running Lotus Notes mail and calendaring applications,with Apple’s upcoming OS X version 10.5-code-named “Leopard”-which is slated to come with its own open-source versions. Ultimately, though, the IT manager eyes replacing most of the remaining Windows servers and all of the desktops with Macs. Meanwhile, all but 15 of the company’s desktop PCs are running Windows. Tayco is currently running three Apple X servers, 15 Windows servers and two IBM iSeries midrange computers on its back-end infrastructure. But Macintosh has turned out to be much more cost-effective, due partly to its scalability,” according to Przemek (pronounced “Chemek”) Wozniak, IT manager of the Toronto, Ontario-based manufacturing firm. “The initial hardware costs were pretty much the same as for Windows PCs. But let’s not compare a Lexus with a Hyundai,” Gartenberg says.Ī couple of years back, Tayco, one of the world’s largest makers of office furniture, reached similar conclusions upon first pricing Mac servers for use on its network. “If you consider a Mac and a low-end PC, the Mac will carry a higher price tag. In Gartenberg’s opinion, Mac machines compare favorably in pricing to similarly outfitted Windows-enabled systems from OEMs such as Dell, Hewlett-Packard and Lenovo. And from that perspective, Macs deliver very well,” he says. They’re interested in things like reliability, build quality, manageability and overall value. “Generally, businesses are not looking strictly at the most budget-minded hardware. But at his own small enterprise-then known as Interpact and now dubbed The Security Awareness Company-three-year TCO turned out to be twice as high for Windows than Mac.īut most enterprises are unlikely to buy ultra-cheap PC hardware anyway, points out Michael Gartenberg, an analyst at JupiterMedia. Schwartau emphasizes that results from the tool can vary considerably from one business to the next. Some six years later, soon after the advent of OS X, computer security expert Winn Schwartau created a widely publicized tool geared to helping companies in any industry measure the TCO of Macs versus Windows PCs. Among many other findings, the authors concluded that Mac creative professionals were producing $26,000 more each in annual revenues for their employers than their Windows counterparts. Gistics’ study was limited strictly to the publishing, graphics and new media fields. In 1999, for instance, Gistics released a landmark report analyzing Macs and PCs in terms of return on investment (ROI). Since then, a number of other theoretical models have also been coined to weigh the business pros and cons of various OSes. The debate over the financial advantages of various OSes first sparked around 15 years ago, when the Gartner Group industry analyst firm came up with the concept of total cost of ownership (TCO). Think the argument in this article is a load of hooey? Believe that it’s the most accurate examination of the Mac in the enterprise? Be sure to read the other viewpoint in Seven Reasons to Think Twice About Macs in the Enterprise. ![]() Now more than ever before, the Mac OS is the most cost effective operating system of all. The advent of Vista and Mac OS X, along with the ascension of Linux, add new dimensions to a long-time controversy. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |